Clockwork Phoenix #3 contents
Dec. 7th, 2009 09:06 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Mike Allen (
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
- "The Gospel of Nachash," Marie Brennan (
swan_tower)
- "Crow Voodoo," Georgina Bruce
- "Braiding the Ghosts," C.S.E. Cooney (
csecooney)
- "Hell Friend," Gemma Files (
handful_ofdust)
- "Lucyna's Gaze," Gregory Frost (
frostokovich )
- "Where Shadows Go at Low Midnight," John Grant (
realthog )
- "Dragons of America," Stacey Hirons
- "Your Name Is Eve," Michael M. Jones (
oneminutemonkey )
- "Fold," Tanith Lee
- "Eyes of Carven Emerald," Shweta Narayan (
shweta_narayan)
- "Lineage," Kenneth Schneyer (
ken_schneyer)
- "Tomorrow Is Saint Valentine's Day," Tori Truslow (
amagiclantern)
- "Murder in Metachronopolis," John C. Wright (
johncwright)
By the way, for some reason there's currently a delay of hours if not days between people leaving comments on this blog and my receiving the customary e-mail notifications. Comments left for me on other people's LJ blogs, by contrast, seem to be coming through fairly promptly, in the usual way. Is anyone else experiencing similar difficulties?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:29 am (UTC)Apparently. I had one yesterday that took hours to come through. I don't many comments now (I forward my posts to Facebook and most of my former LJ commenters now read them there).
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:34 pm (UTC)I vaguely remember there was a problem like this a few months/year ago, and tyhat it suddenly cleared up. But I don't recall it lasting for as long as this one seems to be doing.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:36 pm (UTC)You mean you haven't seen that 10,000-word essay on transcendental meditation in the 17th century I left on your LJ the other day? Well, shame! A work of scholarship the like of which has not been seen since, er, since . . .
no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 04:27 am (UTC)Doric Greek.
'Ere! I used to know her! Lovely lass, was Doric.
Not very tall, though. That's why people called her Little Doric . . .
no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 12:48 am (UTC)My notification of this comment of yours has just arrived at 7.45pm on Wednesday 9/12/'09!
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:38 am (UTC)Yeah, me too on the emailing of comments. I've just been cruising my posts, seeing if the number has changed.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 04:46 am (UTC)Paul
You've made me realize I should have listed the stories in order of authors' real names . . .
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 04:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:36 pm (UTC)Seems universal.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 09:50 pm (UTC)There's always one, isn't there?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 05:11 pm (UTC)*says nothing*
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 04:48 am (UTC)It's a wonderful month for congratulations, isn't it?
Especially when I keep getting them twice over!
xx
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 05:46 am (UTC)Yes, LJ notifications have trickled or ceased altogether for me.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:38 pm (UTC)an anthology series that's been getting a lot of good press of late
It has, hasn't it? *looks nauseatingly smug*
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:39 pm (UTC)Yes. I'm looking forward to getting my mitts on this one.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 09:53 pm (UTC)but seem to be completely unable to write a story that fits
It is very hard indeed to know what Mike's going to like; his tastes are a bit more complex than those of many other editors.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 12:45 pm (UTC)I was euphemizing . . .
no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 09:53 pm (UTC)Why thank you, ma'am.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 04:30 am (UTC)They're beginning to come through in dribs and drabs -- and they're still working through days-old comments. The nuisance is, of course, that one has to open each and every e-mail notification just in case there's a comment in among them that one hasn't seen before.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 11:45 am (UTC)