I'm no fan of Maureen Dowd's but . . .
Oct. 8th, 2008 06:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
. . . the concluding sentence of her NYT piece the other day about Sarah Palin's various homicidal attacks upon vocabulary, grammar and (in the larger sense) syntax deserves mention. It is a very simple observation that should be made more often:
True mavericks don’t brand themselves.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 12:28 am (UTC)http://www.observer.com/2008/media/sarah-palin-and-new-clear-option
But in a debate, without tele-prompters, she is helpless as a babe.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 01:32 am (UTC)"Until she does her 'come upstairs' wink."
Is that what it is? I'd assumed she had conjunctivitis.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 01:57 am (UTC)I heard that one's aim doesn't get better with age.
(I can't help myself sometimes. Just gotta say what comes to mind!)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:28 am (UTC)"I heard that one's aim doesn't get better with age."
Sort of Night of the Living McCain, you mean?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:44 am (UTC)Well, doggone!
(Fortunately, or you two'd be hurling it into the hot tub along with the others . . .)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:11 am (UTC)Now, quickly, go scrub your brain out with lye soap to erase that image from your mind. It stings, but can be effective.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 10:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 01:31 am (UTC)"they have gotten in the habit of phonetically spelling the word "new-clear" on her tele-prompters: http://www.observer.com/2008/media/sarah-palin-and-new-clear-option"
That is very funny!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:07 am (UTC)As it is, my suspension-of-disbelief regarding actual events is on hiatus. Please wave some sort of flag when it's safe for me to re-engage. I cannot keep up on my own.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-11 11:42 pm (UTC)I put things like this into The Dragons of Manhattan and at least one of the reviewers has complained the satire is "too broad".
I mean, it's fuckin' real life, isn't it? I never dared posit something like Troopergate -- now that, I'd have thought, would've been straining credulity: not because of the level of corruption, which sadly we've come to expect of the Republicans (and even some Democrats, perhaps three of them. See? I can do "balance"!), but the sheer fuckwitted banality.
The only thing Trooper Wooten did right according to Gov Palin and the First Dude was, it seems, not be black.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 12:20 am (UTC)That is too funny.
Someone famous once said something along the lines of: the main difference between fiction and nonfiction is that fiction has a responsibility to maintain plausibility, whereas nonfiction has no such constraints. It might have been Mark Twain, I don't know.
Ond day I'm sure "Dragons" will make the leap from "too implausible" to "not fictiony enough." I would actually bet money on that, and I am not a betting man.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 12:23 am (UTC)"the main difference between fiction and nonfiction is that fiction has a responsibility to maintain plausibility, whereas nonfiction has no such constraints"
I know the quote but, like you, can't for the moment place it.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-12 12:35 am (UTC)The human race sure is an interesting group. A species whose sheer showmanship is unparalleled in the history of the earth. So we've got that going for us.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:27 am (UTC)I'm tiptoeing away from you two.
It's enough to drive a man to lye soap.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 02:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-09 01:29 pm (UTC)