the fashion plate
Sep. 5th, 2008 08:16 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As you might expect, I spend most of my leisure hours combing the pages of Vanity Fair. And what should I come across but this spellbinding piece of haut couture analysis:
One of the persistent memes in the Republican line of attack against Barack Obama is the notion that he is an elitist, whereas the G.O.P. represent real working Americans like Levi “F-in’ Redneck” Johnston.
It caught our attention, then, when First Lady Laura Bush and would-be First Lady Cindy McCain took the stage Tuesday night wearing some rather fancy designer clothes. So we asked our fashion department to price out their outfits.
Laura Bush
Oscar de la Renta suit: $2,500
Stuart Weitzman heels: $325
Pearl stud earrings: $600–$1,500
Total: Between $3,425 and $4,325
Cindy McCain
Oscar de la Renta dress: $3,000
Chanel J12 White Ceramic Watch: $4,500
Three-carat diamond earrings: $280,000
Four-strand pearl necklace: $11,000–$25,000
Shoes, designer unknown: $600
Total: Between $299,100 and $313,100
Wow! No wonder McCain has so many houses: his wife has the price of a Scottsdale split-level hanging from her ears.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 12:36 am (UTC)What would I know, sans 7 houses, airplanes, millions of dollars of inhertance?
Love, C.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 12:41 am (UTC)"Should probably shift that down about a 90 - 100 thou at least."
Real Woolworths, then.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 01:29 am (UTC)Laura Bush is the true conservative here. Wow. Cindy McCain really is a maverick, and a liberal in disguise! ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 01:29 pm (UTC)Actually, it's perfectly possible she was overcharged: someone that rich, they don't care if they pay a hundred grand over the odds for their earrings.
If the $5-an-hour gardener slopes off ten minutes early, however . . .
no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 07:09 pm (UTC)"Michoacán"
Of course! That's where the name McCain comes from! It's just that the spelling's been corrupted over the years -- was originally "M'c'cán".
Now I understand . . .
no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 07:35 pm (UTC)"You're saying he keeps her grass neatly mown?"
I can't think as I've heard it thus described before, but . . .
no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 01:36 pm (UTC)It sort of goes alongside the breathtaking brazenness of their telling the same whoppers over and over again during their convention speeches, even though everyone except the television pundits knows these are lies.
The one that took my breath away the most was probably the most trivial: Palin saying that Obama has written two memoirs. Fact-check: Obama has written one memoir; the candidate who's written two is, er, John McCain.
Why would the Repugs feel the need to lie about something so tangential? Who knows? Maybe they're all like Nixon and lie even when they don't have to, just for practice?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 07:10 pm (UTC)"I think I'm splurging when I buy my wife $50 earrings"
I didn't know they made earrings that expensive. Please don't tell Pam!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 07:25 pm (UTC)