oldie but goodie
Apr. 22nd, 2008 12:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well, golly! I've just discovered that, in the closing minutes (literally) of last year, Angela Gunn of the USA Today blog Tech_Space posted her Best Science Books of 2007 list, and among the nine books there is my own Corrupted Science. I am, naturally, very, very pleased!
Gunn gives the book a good capsule review, too:
. . . this looked . . . like one of those bargain throwaways you see at Barnes and Noble -- until you remember how much fun Grant's 2006 Discarded Science was and scoop it up in search of chewy anecdotal goodness. The tone this time is considerably darker . . . His comparison of the current administration's assault on scientific truth and inquiry goes even further than Christopher Mooney's 2005 The Republican War on Science -- but then again the administration's had two more years to run amuck.
For the rest, see http://blogs.usatoday.com/techspace/2007/12/closing-the-boo.html. This is like finding an unopened Christmas present!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 05:14 pm (UTC)That US publicist who marketed Corrupted Science as a children's book needs to have a voodoo dolly sent her way...one with a note attached to it outlining the distinction between "adult" and "juvenile".
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 07:50 pm (UTC)To be fair, this is probably a product of her efforts. In among all the Disney Fun, etc., on her list was USA Today. It's not too much of a stretch to reckon that the copy sent to the newspaper made its way to the blogger.
It looks to be a pretty good blog, incidentally. I'm planning to go bacvk for a rootle through it when I have a bit more leisure.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 07:50 pm (UTC)Thanks, ma'am!
How's your daughter today?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 08:54 pm (UTC)Adie news, please!
You are being nagged . . .
no subject
Date: 2008-04-23 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 06:15 pm (UTC)What is "egoboo"?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 07:52 pm (UTC)Thanks, Louis! (And I know I owe you a long post, but time's tight right now.)
Egoboo is a fannish term for shameless self-promotion -- I think the origins are ego + boost, but I may be wrong.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 08:01 pm (UTC)You owe me nothing, my friend. Belief systems can be so internal and private that I never mean to butt into one, and I absolutely respect (and even sometimes agree with) your views on the subject. I assumed that thread was pretty much done anyway, so no worries at all!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 07:52 pm (UTC)Thanks, Laird!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 07:53 pm (UTC)Thanks, JM!
"And having it attached to USA TODAY is icing on the cake."
Not 100% sure about this. Scientific American might have been better. Still, I'm awfully pleased.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 08:52 pm (UTC)"But USA TODAY has lots more readers."
Um. Bites tongue . . .
no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-22 10:26 pm (UTC)Thanks!