my book Corrupted Science re-reviewed

[realthog]

That nice man Jeff VanderMeer has posted a review of my book Corrupted Science on his blog "Ecstatic Days". In part he says:

As a writer and a reviewer, I sometimes come across a book that hasn’t gotten enough attention but seems to deserve that attention not just for its quality, but for its relevance. Corrupted Science by John Grant is one of these books. . . . This isn’t just a wonderfully written and relevant book—it’s also a beautiful little hardcover, lovingly put together . . .

There's lots more at http://www.jeffvandermeer.com:80/2008/04/18/corrupted-science-by-john-grant-resurrected/.

One of the oddities about Corrupted Science is that I, too, in my modest way thought it might be an important book. So did the UK publisher. So even did the book's designer, who sent me a string of e-mails spelling out how much he hoped people would read the book and get the message. Likewise the book's UK publicist. Unfortunately, the book's US distributor decided it'd be best marketed into the wacky-science-fun-for-kids market. Ya know, alongside books like The God Delusion and The Republican War on Science and Toys You Can Make in Your Own Back Yard. Somewhere out there you'll see a lot of very confused kids.

 

Comments

[sarcobatus.livejournal.com]

Yes, I can see where they'd be confused. Just goes to show how much of your book the US distributor DID NOT read. I don't know if it's just the US but it seems that a great deal of people have become so lazy and bereft of critical thinking that it's amazing they even make the effort to eat and copulate. But then, eating and copulating requires zero critical thinking.

Methinks the reptilian brain reigns supreme.

Perfect fodder for robber barons, eh?

[realthog.livejournal.com]

"Just goes to show how much of your book the US distributor DID NOT read."

The publicist concerned seemed proud of the fact that she had not in fact even glanced at it. Nor had she looked at the press release the UK publisher had sent her. Indeed, she got pretty aggressive when we suggested she might have done these things. She had based her expert decisions on the US distributor's catalogue blurb, written by someone long before the book had even gone to the printer.

[scottakennedy.livejournal.com]

That's really frustrating. From the reviews I've read (I admit, the book is still lingering on my Amazon wish list), it sounded like a pretty serious piece of scholarship (like The Mismeasure of Man) rather than a book for kids. Grr.

[realthog.livejournal.com]

"it sounded like a pretty serious piece of scholarship"

"Scholarship" might be going a bit over the top, but, yes, it's a book with serious intent.

[sarcobatus.livejournal.com]

Sheesh.