dimwits

Feb. 7th, 2008 01:02 pm
realthog: (morgan brighteyes)
[personal profile] realthog

From Harper's Weekly Review (http://harpers.org/archive/2008/02/WeeklyReview2008-02-05), something that amused me:

. . . in Britain retail chain Woolworths withdrew from sale a bed for six-year-old girls called the Lolita Midsleeper Combi after receiving complaints from parents. “We had to look it up on Wikipedia,” said a store spokesman. “But we certainly know who she is now.”

Date: 2008-02-07 06:33 pm (UTC)
ext_13461: Foxes Frolicing (Default)
From: [identity profile] al-zorra.livejournal.com
This provokes an incapacity of speech, along with an impulse to giggle, despite one's deep sympathy for that poor girl who Nobakov so mis-used.

Love, C.

Date: 2008-02-07 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarcobatus.livejournal.com
Yeah, crazy, eh? Never heard of Nabokov's Lolita. mssrcrankypants posted about this article a few days ago -- it's depressing that people are so little acquainted with great literature, anymore.

Speaking of great literature, I have begun reading your Take No Prisoners. You, sir, are a great writer.

Date: 2008-02-07 10:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quietselkie.livejournal.com
Methinks the Woolworths crowd spent a little too much time looking at internet pr0n and thought "Lolita" was an alternate word for "girl."

Date: 2008-02-08 12:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hutch0.livejournal.com
Or it's a sad reflection of education in this country. Judgement call.

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728 2930
31      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 2nd, 2025 01:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios