realthog: (shoe)
[personal profile] realthog

Among many great ones, there are some abominably stupid editors out there (I just hope too many people don’t too often regard me as one of the latter), but the experience related here by writer Bev Vincent must surely take the biscuit. It seems the editor concerned has a peculiarly ignorant, myopic and dimwittedly simplistic take on the range of human behaviour and is busily stamping it -- or attempting to stamp it -- on the rest of the world.

All power to Bev Vincent's elbow for refusing to allow such crap.

[[48-page thoggish rant omitted]]

Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] cussedness for posting the link I followed.




Date: 2009-07-18 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thisplacehere.livejournal.com
That is one of the most stupidly myopic and presumptious things I've read in quite some time.

Date: 2009-07-18 10:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

Frightening that the editor concerned apparently has prestige and clout, isn't it?

Date: 2009-07-19 07:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thisplacehere.livejournal.com
Speaking of clout... Further to your exchange with Fledgist down the page, I wonder what this editor would have made of Shirley Crabtree..?

Date: 2009-07-19 01:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

And it's nervous-breakdown time if the author's name is Terry . . .

Date: 2009-07-19 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

I am, incidentally, reading a book by a female Fred at the moment -- Fred Vargas, whose 'tec The Chalk Circle Man has just won the International Dagger. She's by day a French archaeologist whose full forename is Frederique.

(It's a true fab book, by the way. You'd love it.)

Date: 2009-07-19 09:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thisplacehere.livejournal.com
Someone at the Guardian agrees with you about Fred Vargas. I think I'll definitely be investigating (maybe not just yet, though; I've acquired more than enough new books lately...).

Date: 2009-07-19 09:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

That's got to be one of the most inaccurate Grauniad pieces of all time. The journalist gets the names of both central characters wrong (Adamsburg/Adamsberg, Dangland/Danglard) and also which boom introduces the Adamsberg: it's The Chalk Circle Man, even though this is the most recent to be translated, not the later novel Wash This Blood Clean From My Hands.

And this is just from a quick read of the article . . .

Date: 2009-07-19 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

Okay, I walked into that: for "boom" read "book". But I'm not getting paid Grauniad rates . . .

Date: 2009-07-20 05:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thisplacehere.livejournal.com
Oh dear, perhaps I shouldn't have linked to it...

Date: 2009-07-18 10:03 pm (UTC)
ext_13461: Foxes Frolicing (Default)
From: [identity profile] al-zorra.livejournal.com
“Most men don’t think deeply about the dewy greenness of nature.”

Let's not speak of Walt Whitman or Thoreau in the U.S. for instance, or in the UK, oh, say, Shakespeare, Wordsworth, Shelley, Keats, Scott, D.H. Lawrence, the P.D. James character, Inspector and poet, Adam Dalgliesh -- ooops, he's created by a girl author.

How is such an idiot an editor?

Date: 2009-07-18 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

"How is such an idiot an editor?"

One for whom the adjective "blithering" would seem to have been invented, I agree.

But what's perhaps as bad, on later reflection, is the behaviour of the editor who originally solicited and accepted the story -- just turning round and bending over, and apparently insisting her/his authors do likewise. In my day (insert phthisic wheeze here) one of the duties of editors was to stand up for their authors.

I kinda wish Vincent would name names, so we'd all know who to avoid . . .

Date: 2009-07-18 10:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

"Let's not speak of Walt Whitman or . . . Adam Dalgliesh"

Or, for that matter, me. Come to think of it, I know men in the fricking Armed Forces of two different countries who are sensitive to nature like this. The editor really must be living on a different planet.

Date: 2009-07-19 02:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com
Any man who has spent a reasonable amount of time working in the countryside has a reasonable sensitivity to nature and appreciation of dewy greenness.

Bloody hell, Shakespeare wrote believable women, and, for that matter, I have no trouble with, say, Ursula Le Guin's men.

Date: 2009-07-19 03:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

"Bloody hell, Shakespeare wrote believable women, and, for that matter, I have no trouble with, say, Ursula Le Guin's men."

To be fair, I don't think the editor's saying people can't write their opposite gender. Rather, the editor's crime is (a) having an incredibly simplistic, halfwitted view of gender differences and (b) attempting aggressively to impose that view on others.

The fact that Bev Vincent is in fact male merely serves to spotlight the editor's folly; but the folly itself is the editor's assumption that all males are jockrot-scratching insensitive dumbbells-on-legs ("walking dildoes", in Valerie Solanas's immortal phrase), and the insistence that others accept this illusion.

Date: 2009-07-19 04:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com
One wonders how the editor manages to put one foot after the other.

Date: 2009-07-18 10:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pds-lit.livejournal.com
Oh yes, an editor from planet Stupid. My guess is under 30, arrogant and doesn't know it head from from the end of where its brains are.

Date: 2009-07-19 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

That would be my guess too.

Date: 2009-07-19 02:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com
“And I can’t think of many guys from [setting] who call home every Sunday afternoon to talk to their family”

As a divorced father who does just that (and still do even though my sons are in their twenties), I'm gobsmacked.

I wonder what the editor in question would have made of Evelyn Waugh, or of my teacher Tracy Strong?

Date: 2009-07-19 03:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

"I wonder what the editor in question would have made of Evelyn Waugh, or of my teacher Tracy Strong?"

Or of the great UK literary agent Hilary Rubinstein, or of anyone in the UK called Robin, or . . .?

Date: 2009-07-19 03:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

Or for that matter Marion Morrison.

Date: 2009-07-19 04:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com
Who, for some reason, is always the American right-winger's standard of manliness.

Date: 2009-07-19 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

"Who, for some reason, is always the American right-winger's standard of manliness."

Despite being quite obviously a girl.

Date: 2009-07-19 01:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com
What does one say about Greer Garson?

Date: 2009-07-19 01:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

How can I possibly answer that question when my wife might read this page?

Date: 2009-07-19 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com
Are you insinuating that Pam, who calls you her Dearest, might heat up to, oh, two or three million Scoville units, if you were to admit to a vicarious affection for a movie star who's been dead for thirteen years?

Date: 2009-07-19 02:33 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-07-19 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com

Nothing good about it . . .

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728 2930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 24th, 2025 08:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios