Fred Thompson's Physics Masterclass
Dec. 18th, 2007 04:41 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
"I hope that they are accurate with this assessment [the NIE re Iran's nuclear program], but right now, I don't have the confidence in our own intelligence capabilities to make that assessment[.] . . . Nowadays they can have a peaceful nuclear program and it's very, very easy once they get to that level to turn a screw or two and make it into a weapons program. It's a thin line," Thompson said.
In full at: http://www.journalgazette.net/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071204/APP/712040854&template=apart
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 11:29 pm (UTC)You're right about Campbell. Love him or hate him, he was a properly, fully-evolved political animal. Compared to him, Bush and Cheney and their lackeys are Little-Leaguers. We may not see his like again.
And I don't think there's anyone who takes Michael Crichton seriously as a climatologist. Oh, please god tell me there isn't...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 11:46 pm (UTC)(1) Il Buce himself, Our Glorious Leader, who called him to the White House to consult him on global warming.
(2) Therefore, the (then) GOP-dominated Houses of Congress, including Environmental Issues Senate Chairman James Inhofe, a man whose rear you cannot kick without risk of breaking his neck.
(3) Therefore, your distinguished journalistic colleagues at FOX News.
(4) Therefore, large sections of the US public.
Did I remember to post your journalistic colleague Michael Savage's supposedly science-based description of the Nobel Committee (which one?) as "90% socialist perverts". I must go and check . . .
no subject
Date: 2007-12-18 11:57 pm (UTC)3) They are not my colleagues except in the loosest possible sense and I wish you'd stop spreading the entirely spurious rumour that I work for Big Rupe.
I'm a journalist, I'm not responsible for these people...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-19 12:21 am (UTC)Sorry, but, er . . .
no subject
Date: 2007-12-20 11:56 pm (UTC)