![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
realthogRepublican Minnesota Congressperson Michele Bachmann has a fairly fragile grasp on logic, so it's probably expecting her to have anything even that good when it comes to basic scientific principles such as cause-and-effect. Or maybe she lives in her very own little quantum universe . . .
Whatever, she's attempting now to politicize swine flu -- not the way in which the racists are, by blaming it on Mexican immigrants, but in her own unique fashion. The occurrence of epidemics of swine flu is, in the Bachmannian view, perhaps related to the political persuasion of the US President in office at the time.
Interviewed by the rightist Pajamas Media:
I find it interesting that it was back in the 1970s that the swine flu broke out then under another Democrat president Jimmy Carter. . . . And I'm not blaming this on President Obama, I just think it's an interesting coincidence.
You can watch the full video of the interview (18 excruciating twaddle-packed minutes) at Pajamas Media, or you can find the salient moments -- and relevant slice of transcript -- at Talking Points Memo.
The latter points out a historical factoid which it gleaned in turn from the Minneapolis/St. Paul City Pages: the swine flu outbreak of the 1970s occurred, to be more precise, in 1976 . . . when the US President was a Republican, Gerald Ford.
Oops.
They laughed at Galileo, they laughed at Einstein, they . . .
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-04-29 02:53 pm (UTC)If there's a real connection, Im happy for people to tout it, in fact, they should, to explain why their person or idea is better than another. But to suggest that this outbreak of swine flu could have been stopped if John McCaine was in office for the last 100 days is not just absurd, but, as you point out, shows a greed for ignorance of science.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:30 am (UTC)"a greed for ignorance of science"
And a complete logical disconnect. The rightists seem to be incapable these days of stringing together a single logical thought. A couple of days ago I saw a Bill O'Reilly clip in which he stated that it was "a fact" that torture had protected the country because there hadn't been a successful terrorist attack on home soil since 9/11. I was reminded of the old joke about keeping the wild elephants away:
An old man kept walking naked through the streets of Philadelphia, farting and clapping his hands.
"Why are you doing this?" they said.
"To keep the wild elephants away."
"But this is Philadelphia! There aren't any wild elephants around here!"
"I know," said the old man, continuing to fart and clap. "See? It works, doesn't it?"
no subject
Date: 2009-04-29 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-29 03:06 pm (UTC)http://dumpbachmann.blogspot.com/
Personally, I hope she sticks around for a long time. Her brand of insanity shines a great spotlight on the GOP.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:31 am (UTC)I get Bachmann info from all over as it is -- I'm not sure I could stomach any more than I already get!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:31 am (UTC)I get Bachmann info from all over as it is -- I'm not sure I could stomach any more than I already get!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-29 04:26 pm (UTC)Feh.
As if virii go, Ooooooh, a dem prez, now we can spread havoc and howling.
Better that we have better oversight and regulation and treatment of meat animals.
Everywhere.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:33 am (UTC)All of which is evident . . . but not to Bachmann. The mind truly boggles. I mean, presumably she had an education . . .
no subject
Date: 2009-04-29 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:38 am (UTC)What's depressing is that one could ask the same question about a whole stack of people who're regularly featured on TV, both politicians and supposed pundits/journalists, who seem incapable of logical thought. Tomaq produced a useful list (to which I added a few) when commenting on a previous post of mine: http://realthog.livejournal.com/105874.html. It's not just that these people are rightists: it's that they seem to lack the basic skill of thinking -- and far too many of their audience seem likewise to lack that skill.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 04:15 pm (UTC)It just is not.
This is irrational because it is religion. They are deeply in love with their religion which in their minds is a cosmic war of good and evil, and they are the good, mirroring heaven (and this is as true of the crazy islamic and israeli hardcore -- and probably hindus and sikhs too) and we with truth, rationality, science, facts, objectivity, relativity are the evil, mirroring satan and hell.
You cannot discuss or negotiate.
Love, C.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 05:49 pm (UTC)As I said: "it's that they seem to lack the basic skill of thinking -- and far too many of their audience seem likewise to lack that skill". It's the inability -- or refusal -- to reason . . . and as such it does indeed bear many resemblances to religious faith.
Yet these people pretend to rationality, to reason, and therefore, when they abuse it, they need to be called on this -- in the same way that Creation Scientists need to be called on the "science" part of their claims. (There are of course lots of other reasons to confront creationists, just as there are legion reasons to confront rightists. But here I'm concerned with a specific remit.)
I liked Kyle's expression, further up the page: "a greed for ignorance"
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 06:07 pm (UTC)The only thing that will make any difference is that they get no public attention to their bs. That NOBODY PAYS THEM ANY ATTENTION.
They whine all the time as it is that they are victimized and kept out of the discourse. So they should really be kept out of the discourse so they can at least for once tell a fact.
Love, C.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 06:13 pm (UTC)"it will make NO DIFFERENCE"
No difference to them, but in fact on occasion a difference to their audience. We know people who've seen the light about some of these demagogues, having discovered them telling one lie too many.
I'm not happy with the notion of simply ignoring the creeps. Everyone said this was the best thing to do with the loonies of the rightist noise machine, and guess what? We got two terms of Bush, and found ourselves living in a torture state.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 06:18 pm (UTC)"It's nothing but a treasonous propaganda arm"
Couldn't agree more.
I was pleased to note the other day that Fox News's very own sweetheart, Antonin Scalia, wrote the Supreme Court ruling that Fox TV should pay that completely bloody halfwitted fine to the FCC for Bono having said "fuck" on live television. You play with vipers like Scalia and sooner or later you get bit.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 06:15 pm (UTC)Fox News -- Unfair and Unbalanced, as always.
I thought it was "We Distort, You Decide"?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 06:13 pm (UTC)*snort!*
no subject
Date: 2009-05-01 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-01 03:49 pm (UTC)Or, as Rush Limbaugh would say, The Four Stooges.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-01 05:16 pm (UTC)