oh my

[realthog]

There's a new review of Bogus Science up at Amazon that's a bit more mixed than the previous one. The reviewer has a couple of things he and I simply disagree about, which is fair enough I suppose (though a bit less certainty in her/his statement of position might have been nice), but it's a thoughtful review and was highly flattering about most of the book. And one quote in particular is likely to be bandied about Snarl Towers a lot:

The author's style is reminiscent of Stephen Jay Gould at his best.

Comments

[http://users.livejournal.com/la_marquise_de_/]

Woohoo!

[desperance.livejournal.com]

(though a bit less certainty in her/his statement of position might have been nice)

Less certainty? On the internet? Oh, bless your heart, you sweet young innocent thing, you...

[sarcobatus.livejournal.com]

And one quote in particular is likely to be bandied about Snarl Towers a lot:

The author's style is reminiscent of Stephen Jay Gould at his best.

My sympathies to Saint Pamela.

*psst, congrats*

[txtriffidranch.livejournal.com]

WOW. That's exactly what I've been saying for two years, but I'm glad someone else spotted it. (In my case, I've had a similar review experience, only with my being compared to Hunter S. Thompson and Joe Bob Briggs. I can deal with that.)