time for Zardari to Bhutto out
Dec. 31st, 2007 11:42 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
realthogIt's far from always that I agree with Tariq Ali, but he has an excellent piece on the front page of today's Independent (UK national daily newspaper; essential reading for, inter alia, its coverage of US politics, foreign news, and, er, cricket -- many of my friends on this side of the pond have gotten into the habit of subscribing to the Indy's daily headlines). You can find Tariq's piece in full at http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article3295851.ece, and I strongly urge you to read it all. Here's a taste:
My heart bleeds for Pakistan. It deserves better than this grotesque feudal charade
Six hours before she was executed, Mary, Queen of Scots wrote to her brother-in-law, Henry III of France: "...As for my son, I commend him to you in so far as he deserves, for I cannot answer for him." The year was 1587.
On 30 December 2007, a conclave of feudal potentates gathered in the home of the slain Benazir Bhutto to hear her last will and testament being read out and its contents subsequently announced to the world media. Where Mary was tentative, her modern-day equivalent left no room for doubt. She could certainly answer for her son.
A triumvirate consisting of her husband, Asif Zardari (one of the most venal and discredited politicians in the country and still facing corruption charges in three European courts) and two ciphers will run the party till Benazir's 19-year-old son, Bilawal, comes of age. He will then become chairperson-for-life and, no doubt, pass it on to his children. The fact that this is now official does not make it any less grotesque. The Pakistan People's Party is being treated as a family heirloom, a property to be disposed of at the will of its leader.
Nothing more, nothing less. Poor Pakistan. Poor People's Party supporters. Both deserve better than this disgusting, medieval charade.
Benazir's last decision was in the same autocratic mode as its predecessors, an approach that would cost her – tragically – her own life. Had she heeded the advice of some party leaders and not agreed to the Washington-brokered deal with Pervez Musharraf or, even later, decided to boycott his parliamentary election she might still have been alive. Her last gift to the country does not augur well for its future.
I would add only the quite likely idiotic observation that we have absolutely no guarantee Benazir Bhutto's will contained what it has been announced to contain. The announcers were, after all, those very same . . . but you got there before me.
My heart bleeds for Pakistan. It deserves better than this grotesque feudal charade
Six hours before she was executed, Mary, Queen of Scots wrote to her brother-in-law, Henry III of France: "...As for my son, I commend him to you in so far as he deserves, for I cannot answer for him." The year was 1587.
On 30 December 2007, a conclave of feudal potentates gathered in the home of the slain Benazir Bhutto to hear her last will and testament being read out and its contents subsequently announced to the world media. Where Mary was tentative, her modern-day equivalent left no room for doubt. She could certainly answer for her son.
A triumvirate consisting of her husband, Asif Zardari (one of the most venal and discredited politicians in the country and still facing corruption charges in three European courts) and two ciphers will run the party till Benazir's 19-year-old son, Bilawal, comes of age. He will then become chairperson-for-life and, no doubt, pass it on to his children. The fact that this is now official does not make it any less grotesque. The Pakistan People's Party is being treated as a family heirloom, a property to be disposed of at the will of its leader.
Nothing more, nothing less. Poor Pakistan. Poor People's Party supporters. Both deserve better than this disgusting, medieval charade.
Benazir's last decision was in the same autocratic mode as its predecessors, an approach that would cost her – tragically – her own life. Had she heeded the advice of some party leaders and not agreed to the Washington-brokered deal with Pervez Musharraf or, even later, decided to boycott his parliamentary election she might still have been alive. Her last gift to the country does not augur well for its future.
I would add only the quite likely idiotic observation that we have absolutely no guarantee Benazir Bhutto's will contained what it has been announced to contain. The announcers were, after all, those very same . . . but you got there before me.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-12-31 07:45 pm (UTC)We're really up it.
Love, C.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-31 08:13 pm (UTC)We're "up it" so far as wielding our influence with Pakistan in the War on Terror yah-di-yah-di-yah-di is concerned, but as the War on Terror, if the concept even means anything, has long ago been lost (it was lost the moment Il Buce and his Administration started following the terrorists' script, and doubly lost when the Administration began using the terrorists' methods) and has become merely an obscenely expensive, obscenely murderous distraction from vastly more important matters like the imminence of human-species-endangering climate change, I'm not so sure this matters.
Obviously the likelihood of untold suffering in Pakistan is something that should concern us, but that's a quite distinct issue from our merely being "up it"!
If you mean the Bush Administration is "up it", then I couldn't agree with you more. One of life's little pleasures, eh?
no subject
Date: 2007-12-31 08:27 pm (UTC)The economy, o babeeeeee.
And that too drags in the rest of the world. You saw what the British PM advised his citizens re the credit smash.
Love, C.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-01 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-01 02:40 am (UTC)K, can we believe a word that is printed or spoken in this country? One of the reasons I and lots of US pals read the Indy and/or Times and/or Grauniad and/or BBC is that we're far more likely to find ourselves reading the true story of what's going on here. I'm sure Dave will tell you much the same!
Must get back to our guests. One of them brought a three-litre bottle of very good Belgian lambic beer, so the ol' typing reflexes are ebbin' fast . . .
no subject
Date: 2008-01-02 01:51 am (UTC)