Date: 2009-08-15 10:14 am (UTC)
Agreed absolutely. Elitism gives itself a bad name when it tries to dismiss entire categories of cultural artefact. What it should be about is championing the best of everything, wherever it comes from -- and I think there's a slow-but-sure move in that direction now (e.g. an Elastic Press book winning a major literary award).

I've become less tolerant towards mediocre books, particularly now I have less time to read than I used to. It's changed the way I review: these days, I don't want to write about books that do mediocre things with middling success; I want to tell people about great books that do interesting things. And, by being that bit more selective, I've read so many excellent books this year.

Did you see the brouhaha that came about when Adam Roberts took the Hugo shortlists to task for being -- as he saw them -- mediocre? He got accused of elitism by a number of people, and some didn't seem to like the idea of reading anything challenging. Which is fine, if that's what they want. But... all the best books I've read this year were challenging in their different ways, and enormous fun to read. There's no way I can be satisfied with a diet of entertaining-but-ordinary fiction after that.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728 2930
31      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 03:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios