Entry tags:
book #3
While looking for something else at the local library -- a research item for Bogus Science -- I spotted Tim M. Berra's Charles Darwin: The Concise Story of an Extraordinary Man (2009) on the Recent Acquisitions display. Since I remembered enjoying Berra's Evolution and the Myth of Creationism and since I'd just finished reading James Scott Bell's dire pro-Intelligent Design novel The Darwin Conspiracy (more about which later), and since I realized I'd never read a Darwin bio, and since Berra's new book is even more concise than the title suggests . . . well, home it went.
This is a really jolly little book, beautifully designed with lots of illustrations, and very nicely written. Based on a lecture Berra's apparently been delivering at regular intervals for some while, it gave me just enough for it to qualify as a genuine biography without very much excess. Plenty of interesting facts came out -- for example, I hadn't realized (or, more accurately, hadn't remembered) that the Beagle's voyage lasted just short of five years, or that Darwin laboured a full eight years of his prime working life classifying 10,000 species of barnacles ("I hate a barnacle as no man ever did before," he declared midway through), or that Darwin shared the same birthday, February 12 1809, with Abraham Lincoln -- a black day for bigots everywhere! And so on.
I'm quite reluctant to let the book go back to the library, in fact. At some point when I'm feeling a bit richer (its cover price of $20 is quite steep for something so small, however much it may be perfectly formed) I must pick up my very own copy to cuddle and cosset.
no subject
no subject
Yes, but there are lots of other books currently demanding my 20 bucks more than this one now is.
The sneaky stratagem I may have to employ is to buy it as a stocking-stuffer for Pam next Christmas -- in those terms it doesn't seem quite such an expensive purchase!
no subject
Poor Pam.
no subject
Love, C.
no subject
I hadn't realized until reading this book just quite how intertwined the two families were. Charles Darwin and Emma Wedgwood were first cousins, a relationship that in some societies might make their marriage incestuous, in not in law then at least in social estimation. It obviously concerned Charles quite a lot when his researches into plant breeding, etc., showed him how the offspring of unrelated lines were much stronger than those of closely related ones, or self-pollinated plants.
no subject
no subject
It was the bassoon that made me love that story. Darwin could have used a trumpet or a drum, but it was a bassoon.
no subject
In fact, the worms were unimpressed by music per se. They did, however, react when he put them on top of Emma's piano while she was playing it.
Berra tells about this, What he omitted to relate was how Emma herself reacted when Charles put his earthworms on her piano while she was playing it.
no subject
Emma: `Oh, Charles did the thing with the earthworms and the piano.'
Emma's friend: `Not again! Oh, you poor dear.'
Emma: `It could have been worse. It could have been the honey badgers. *sigh*'
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
"he described the sexual habits of a number of different species to her"
Doesn't everyone propose like that?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's a very thin book . . .