McCain pursues pedophile vote

[realthog]

The estimable David Sirota has the full story over on HuffPo. Here's how he starts:

Last night, I appeared on Rachel Maddow's new MSNBC show to discuss John McCain's new ad attacking Barack Obama on education. You can watch the discussion here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qnlad9fRbGg

In airing this ad, McCain has done something I never thought I would see: He has sponsored a new television commercial that effectively declares his support for child molestor rights.

I'm dead serious here: The ad explicitly criticizes Obama for supporting state legislation that the Kansas City Star notes was designed to give "schools the ability to warn young children about inappropriate touching and sexual predators."

So by basic logical deduction, then, McCain's ad attacking Obama for supporting that bill means McCain would have opposed it - meaning he would have taken the side of the Pedophilia Lobby that wants young children to not understand when they are being molested. I'm wondering - is there a NAMBLA endorsement in the works for McCain? The Arizona senator sure seems to be courting that interest group with this latest declaration.

 It's kind of typical, isn't it, that the McCain campaign should put the scoring of cheap political points, however dishonestly, ahead of the safety of kindergarten children?

Nice guys, aren't they?

No wonder people call them Repugnicans . . .

 

Comments

[fledgist.livejournal.com]

Shouldn't he get Gary Glitter as a spokesman?

[realthog.livejournal.com]

I think it's what they mean by "family values".

But I don't really feel like joking about this. I'm so furious with these pathetic, dishonest exploitative little shits, and with large swathes of the US public for being so stupid as to be taken in by this garbage, that . . .

[fledgist.livejournal.com]

I understand completely.

[louismaistros.livejournal.com]

The title of this entry made me laugh out loud.

Thank you, sir.