realthog: (Default)
realthog ([personal profile] realthog) wrote2008-09-06 02:35 pm

two (countem, two!) mysteries solved


On a list called The Spammers, of which I'm lucky enough to be a part, there was cited a letter that was published in today's Philadelphia Inquirer:

I really would like to know exactly what books Sarah Palin wanted to ban from the Wasilla Public Library so I can read them before January. 
             ----Cynthia First, Downingtown

Naturally, this prompted some discussion amongst us as to the identity of the dangerously offensive/tantalizingly obscene/treasonously seditious items, and it emerged that one of them was Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird.

 Huh? we all cried. What could possibly be offensive about To Kill a Mockingbird?

Step forward and take a bow, artist Ray Ridenour, with the obvious explanation:

Apparently it wasn't killed with a 30 ought 6 after an invigorating helicopter pursuit.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2008-09-06 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)

Meanwhile, what did you think of Ray's joke? -- my reason for posting this entry.

[identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com 2008-09-06 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Not a bad joke, of its kind.

[identity profile] eglady.livejournal.com 2008-09-06 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
The part where it is a mockingbird is wherein lies the irony.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2008-09-06 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)

That too!