Entry tags:
spousal duties
Oh, gawd, I'm being dragged orft to see Harry Potter and the Half-Cut Prince tonight. Wish me strength, folks.
Last night we likewise went out on a date, and we discovered a magnificent beer: Troeg's Hopback Amber. Now, if I could smuggle a few bottles of that into the cinema tonight perhaps it'd help with the ol' fortitude . . .
no subject
no subject
no subject
"Forgot to add: best of luck..."
Thanks, guv.
no subject
no subject
Like the rest of them, it was moderately okay: good special effects, a couple of good performances, somewhat tedious, derivative plotting -- ya know.
no subject
Further to my last note, there's a pretty accurate review of the movie here: http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/movies/15harry.html?8mu&emc=mu. My only difference from the reviewer would be that I thought (Pam disagrees) Rickman wasn't up to his usual speed.
Oh, and the reviewer doesn't mention that some of the visuals were extraordinarily lovely.
no subject
One of the things that's always annoyed me about the Harry Potter series is that it wants to be 'grown-up', contemporary, and have genuine danger; yet it's set in a quaint, old-fashioned, half-jokey public school world -- and the two just sit awkwardly together. This film sounds like more of the same.
And that's probably the most analytical thing I'll ever write about Harry Potter...
no subject
"the two just sit awkwardly together"
I hadn't really been aware of this in the Potter movies (and anyway, as a general rule, I enjoy such dichotomies, as you know!) until this latest: there's some truly ghastly adolescent clowning (Ron swallows a love potion) smack up against some sterner stuff, and it really, really doesn't work.
no subject
And you didn't pull your own head off even once?
no subject
no subject
I'd stick with the Glenmorangie instead, then.