Entry tags:
spousal duties
Oh, gawd, I'm being dragged orft to see Harry Potter and the Half-Cut Prince tonight. Wish me strength, folks.
Last night we likewise went out on a date, and we discovered a magnificent beer: Troeg's Hopback Amber. Now, if I could smuggle a few bottles of that into the cinema tonight perhaps it'd help with the ol' fortitude . . .
no subject
no subject
I'm seeing it Friday or Saturday with younger daughter and nephew.
no subject
"count yer blessings"
I have told Pam this, and she is much pleased.
Do give Ben my sympathies . . .
no subject
"but you must take spousal duties seriously"
I do! I do! Not just seriously but downright grimly.
"Besides, Harry Potter is a very good movie."
Er, but you haven't yet seen it . . .
"I've seen them all and read the books."
You are braver than I am. I got through the first of the books and that was enough for me. The movies, obviously, have been compulsory, um, treats.
no subject
I've seen the other movies and read all the books. You know, my juvenile side craves young adult books.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
"Forgot to add: best of luck..."
Thanks, guv.
no subject
And you didn't pull your own head off even once?
no subject
Oh, I dunno. With a midnight showing I might have been able to sleep through it . . .
no subject
The last time we did that we gotr thrown out, didn't we?
no subject
no subject
no subject
I tried watching the previous Potter flick and got absolutely nowhere because it was relentlessly green and dark.
You will need the Troeg's, doubtless.
Smuggle away -- it's a magic potion to keep away the muggle.
I still, despite this Potter era, see or hear the word "muggles," and I think, "Ah, Satchmo, he's getting his maryjane!"
Love, C.
no subject
no subject
no subject
But yeah, it was pretty awesome. :)
no subject
no subject
One of the kids just a few feet away from us at tonight's performance let out an ear-piercing scream at a frightening bit, and I leapt a yard in my seat. It was actually the scream rather than the frightening bit that made me jump; the kid's young eyes spotted the bit in question long before I did, so it was only during my descent, as it were, that I saw what it was she'd screamed at.
no subject
"my juvenile side craves young adult books"
So does mine, just not the Harry Potter books. But Pam reads them all eagerly -- from the UK editions, if she can get them, because the US publisher has done some dumbing down, alas.
no subject
I'd stick with the Glenmorangie instead, then.
no subject
I read only the first book, and it was so "reminiscent of" Diana Wynne Jones that I thought I'd just stick with the original.
no subject
"I've never been able to get through a Harry Potter book."
Pam says that in fact they're not bad. Myself, as noted above to the foxy lady, I'd rather get my periodically necessary Diana Wynne Jones fix from, like, a Diana Wynne Jones book instead.
no subject
I got the bottled Troeg's after we'd come home. It's one of those extremely rare occasions when the bottled version is near as dammit indistinguishable from the draft: if I had the two side by side I could probably detect a difference, but as I'm concerned (and likewise a sampling Pam) the two are identical.
Unfortunately, the brewery declines to ship more than a few hours away from its home, so you'll have no luck looking for it in Atlanta. But if you're ever up in these parts . . .
no subject
no subject
"Rowlings has the vote of a zillion kids or more, so she's doing something right, eh?"
Like Macdonalds, Hannah Montana, Budweiser and cigarettes . . .
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*makes stirring motions*
no subject
no subject
no subject
"So, did you jump twice?"
No! The frightening bit wasn't all that frightening, once I spotted it. It was the scream wot scared the bejabers out of me.
no subject
Like the rest of them, it was moderately okay: good special effects, a couple of good performances, somewhat tedious, derivative plotting -- ya know.
no subject
It was Julie Delpy, I think.
no subject
As noted to thisplacehere further up the page: "Like the rest of them, it was moderately okay: good special effects, a couple of good performances, somewhat tedious, derivative plotting -- ya know."
no subject
Further to my last note, there's a pretty accurate review of the movie here: http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/movies/15harry.html?8mu&emc=mu. My only difference from the reviewer would be that I thought (Pam disagrees) Rickman wasn't up to his usual speed.
Oh, and the reviewer doesn't mention that some of the visuals were extraordinarily lovely.
no subject
One of the things that's always annoyed me about the Harry Potter series is that it wants to be 'grown-up', contemporary, and have genuine danger; yet it's set in a quaint, old-fashioned, half-jokey public school world -- and the two just sit awkwardly together. This film sounds like more of the same.
And that's probably the most analytical thing I'll ever write about Harry Potter...
no subject
"the two just sit awkwardly together"
I hadn't really been aware of this in the Potter movies (and anyway, as a general rule, I enjoy such dichotomies, as you know!) until this latest: there's some truly ghastly adolescent clowning (Ron swallows a love potion) smack up against some sterner stuff, and it really, really doesn't work.