realthog: (Default)
realthog ([personal profile] realthog) wrote2009-04-15 08:47 pm
Entry tags:

kwik geekery


A few days ago I installed IE8, as those friendly folk at Microsoft had been imploring me to do, and promptly all my web-browsing activities became like wading through molasses. Definitely there were some new features I liked, but . . .

So I tried doing a System Restore to get me back to IE7. The net result of this was that I lost web access entirely. Further, I couldn't even undo the System Restore because to do that involves going through Help, and Microsoft's Help is idiotically idiotically idiotically (did I remember to say it's idiotic?) web-bloody-based, so if you don't have web access you can't effing well . . .

You're there ahead of me, aren't you?

Anyway, darling [profile] pds_litvery kindly used her Mac and some googling to get me a download of IE7, which I duly installed. The installation did not in fact install IE7 -- it'd be too much to expect a Microsoft product to do what it says on the packet, wouldn't it? -- but it did install enough of something to allow me to access Help and thereby undo my System Restore.

Finally, I was back on the web, but with slow-as-molasses IE8. Even slower now, if anything.

"Oh, dearie me," I think I might have said in the heat of the moment.

So I did some googling of my own and discovered this. Naturally I was a bit sceptical at first -- the blogger says he himself isn't quite sure why his tweak works -- but I did some cross-checking elsewhere and discovered that for some folk it worked while for others it at least had no adverse effects.

Reader, I'm going to marry him. Well, only if we can get married in Texas or Kentucky. The effect is (to date, at least) astonishing. As far as I can establish, which is difficult when you have so many fingers crossed, everything is now working quicker than it was under IE7.

Anyway, the point of this posting is, obviously, that if you've found the same extraordinary sluggishness with IE8 that I did, Ed Bott's tweak is well worth a try. Thank you, Mr Bott, whoever and wherever you are!

[identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
Might I be so bold as to suggest Firefox?

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 01:15 am (UTC)(link)

"Might I be so bold as to suggest Firefox?"

You've reminded me that I meant to add a line reading AND DON'T BLOODY WELL TELL ME I SHOULD BE USING FIREFOX, OR I'LL TEAR YOUR HEAD OFF.

Or, ahem, words to that effect.

It has been a long, tedious and worrying few hours . . .

[identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, the Scots musician, so eager to use violins....

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 02:59 am (UTC)(link)

And blunt violins at that.

[identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 10:36 am (UTC)(link)
I'd see sharp, major.

[identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 07:49 am (UTC)(link)
Does this also apply to Opera (small, very fast, and relatively bug-free)?

[identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 10:37 am (UTC)(link)
Or even Chrome (smaller, faster)?

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)

I spose I ought to get around to switching to one of the others; primarily, I'm nervous of ****ing up as I attempt to do so.

Chrome incorporates, does it not, the dreaded Google toolbar, which I've been assiduously avoiding. I've heard little about Opera. Would you recommend it? And will it import my Favourites file?

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 04:30 am (UTC)(link)

Just to let you know that yesterday I took my courage in both hands and installed Firefox. So far, so -- although it has some funny little ways I'm not yet used to -- good.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 04:30 am (UTC)(link)

Just to let you know that yesterday I took my courage in both hands and installed Firefox. So far, so -- although it has some funny little ways I'm not yet used to -- good.

[identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
It does have its ways, that's for sure. I do find it a more stable platform to work with than IE, though. Resist the temptation to plunk in too many add-ons.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)

"Resist the temptation to plunk in too many add-ons."

Thanks for the tip. At the moment the challenge is to get it to integrate with my Free Download Manager (or vice versa).

[identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I see. I find it works very well. The only problem I had for a long time was that it didn't work well with Comcast Mail. But Comcast has upgraded their email system and taken care of that problem.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-19 12:40 am (UTC)(link)

"I see. I find it works very well"

In the end, I downloaded (just now) the latest version of Free Download Manager from download.com and installed it. That seems to have performed all the necessary integration for me, and at the moment the two are working harmoniously together.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-19 12:56 am (UTC)(link)

"That's excellent."

I thought so too.

*geekish swagger*

[identity profile] fledgist.livejournal.com 2009-04-19 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
:)

[identity profile] sarcobatus.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
Will we be calling you "Missus Bott" sometime in the near future? Oh, dearie me . . .

I shan't be downloading IE8; thank you very much for the warning, dearie.

LOL! I can see you now, wrestling with the funky Explorer 8.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 02:59 am (UTC)(link)

"the funky Explorer 8"

Purely as a statistical anomaly, "funky" wasn't one of the adjectives I used.

You must have misheard.

[identity profile] sarcobatus.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh I heard correctly, all right. I'm merely practicing "decorum". If I were to write herein what I really heard streaming (screaming) on the wind, I would be censured -- oops, for second here I thought I was over at Amazon.

It was only last Sunday that I called Hutch "Ellen". My mind is slipping.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 04:30 pm (UTC)(link)

"practicing "decorum""

As in "decoral sex"?

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)

Just don't mention teabagging, okay?

[identity profile] sarcobatus.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL!

Which reminds me, I'm going to a garden party this evening, dahling, poolside. I'll be thinking of you . . . and your Tetleys.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)

Glad to see you've cleaned this up a bit in your edit . . .

[identity profile] sarcobatus.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, really? Why am I not convinced . . .

[identity profile] avengangle.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
Huh. I use IE8 at work (goddamn company policy won't let me use a browser with keyboard shortcuts I already know) and it's been faster than IE7. But then again, we have uber-fast internet and a very close connection to The Source of All Internet (in Cleveland, at least) so I may just be lucky. I was SO HAPPY when IE7 introduced tabbed browsing, though. Made my life so much simpler.

I use Firefox at home. Or Epiphany. Or Midori. I tried Chrome once; it was kind of fun but not worth switching. There's also a 'port of Firefox called Iceweasel, which I find amusing, although I haven't used it.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 02:56 am (UTC)(link)

"we have uber-fast internet"

My guess is that it's the computer that determines this, not the internet connection -- Microsoft programs always use about five times the system resources they should on the idiotic assumption that everyone has the very latest and biggest hardware, and I suspect (although it's only "suspect") that the other way I could have solved the problem was to buy an extra gigabyte or three of memory, a faster chip, etc., etc., etc.

Microsoft reminds me of law colleges in so many respects . . .

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 04:31 am (UTC)(link)

Just to let you know that yesterday I took my courage in both hands and installed Firefox. So far, so -- although it has some funny little ways I'm not yet used to -- good.

[identity profile] avengangle.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 01:43 pm (UTC)(link)
And now you can install AdBlock Plus and discover WHY we all use Firefox! (Tools -> Add-ons -> Get Add-ons -> search box, find AdBlock Plus and click!)

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)


And now you can install AdBlock Plus and discover WHY we all use Firefox! (Tools -> Add-ons -> Get Add-ons -> search box, find AdBlock Plus and click!)

Oodles of thanks for the tip! I'll go do that right now.

What I can't do with Firefox is reply to LJ comments via the "Post Reply" button on LJ's e-mails: I jest get an error message, so that I have to swear a lot and then try again via "View the thread" or whatever. Is there a way round this?

[identity profile] avengangle.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm. First, I'm assuming you're using Windows XP and Outlook to read mail -- did you tell Windows that Firefox is your default browser? (This is an option at install.) If not, it could be getting confused. Also, can you open other links from mail (i.e., if someone sends you a YouTube link or something)? If it's ONLY LJ links, then we have an odd problem. If it's ALL links, then I'm sure it's easily fixable.

If that's not the problem, then I'll have to ask Ben (my husband). He probably knows.

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-18 04:25 pm (UTC)(link)

All other links work fine, including those in LJ e-mails. The only thing that doesn't work is the ability to type my reply to a comment in the box in the LJ e-mail and then click the "Post Reply" button below the box.

I should hunt around my LJ options and see if there's something there that hasn't been checked.

[identity profile] pds-lit.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
""Oh, dearie me," I think I might have said in the heat of the moment."

I can assure you that these were not the words! LOL!

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)

I probably said "bottoms!" and "heavens to Betsy" once or twice as well.

[identity profile] pds-lit.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
To me it sounded like the old Scottish accent was emerging which indicates something entirely different. :)

[identity profile] sarcobatus.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Now, that's scary.

I watched a Scottish flick the other night and couldn't understand a thing they were saying, had to turn on the subtitles. And they were speaking English, I think, or something trying to pass for English. ;P

[identity profile] realthog.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)

If Scots can understand the American corruption of English but Americans can't understand the Scottish corruption of English, what does that say about the relative IQs of the two peoples?

Hm?

[identity profile] sarcobatus.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
That Scots like to belabor the obvious.