Entry tags:
kwik geekery
A few days ago I installed IE8, as those friendly folk at Microsoft had been imploring me to do, and promptly all my web-browsing activities became like wading through molasses. Definitely there were some new features I liked, but . . .
So I tried doing a System Restore to get me back to IE7. The net result of this was that I lost web access entirely. Further, I couldn't even undo the System Restore because to do that involves going through Help, and Microsoft's Help is idiotically idiotically idiotically (did I remember to say it's idiotic?) web-bloody-based, so if you don't have web access you can't effing well . . .
You're there ahead of me, aren't you?
Anyway, darling
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Finally, I was back on the web, but with slow-as-molasses IE8. Even slower now, if anything.
"Oh, dearie me," I think I might have said in the heat of the moment.
So I did some googling of my own and discovered this. Naturally I was a bit sceptical at first -- the blogger says he himself isn't quite sure why his tweak works -- but I did some cross-checking elsewhere and discovered that for some folk it worked while for others it at least had no adverse effects.
Reader, I'm going to marry him. Well, only if we can get married in Texas or Kentucky. The effect is (to date, at least) astonishing. As far as I can establish, which is difficult when you have so many fingers crossed, everything is now working quicker than it was under IE7.
Anyway, the point of this posting is, obviously, that if you've found the same extraordinary sluggishness with IE8 that I did, Ed Bott's tweak is well worth a try. Thank you, Mr Bott, whoever and wherever you are!
no subject
no subject
"Might I be so bold as to suggest Firefox?"
You've reminded me that I meant to add a line reading AND DON'T BLOODY WELL TELL ME I SHOULD BE USING FIREFOX, OR I'LL TEAR YOUR HEAD OFF.
Or, ahem, words to that effect.
It has been a long, tedious and worrying few hours . . .
no subject
no subject
And blunt violins at that.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I spose I ought to get around to switching to one of the others; primarily, I'm nervous of ****ing up as I attempt to do so.
Chrome incorporates, does it not, the dreaded Google toolbar, which I've been assiduously avoiding. I've heard little about Opera. Would you recommend it? And will it import my Favourites file?
no subject
Just to let you know that yesterday I took my courage in both hands and installed Firefox. So far, so -- although it has some funny little ways I'm not yet used to -- good.
no subject
Just to let you know that yesterday I took my courage in both hands and installed Firefox. So far, so -- although it has some funny little ways I'm not yet used to -- good.
no subject
no subject
"Resist the temptation to plunk in too many add-ons."
Thanks for the tip. At the moment the challenge is to get it to integrate with my Free Download Manager (or vice versa).
no subject
no subject
"I see. I find it works very well"
In the end, I downloaded (just now) the latest version of Free Download Manager from download.com and installed it. That seems to have performed all the necessary integration for me, and at the moment the two are working harmoniously together.
no subject
no subject
"That's excellent."
I thought so too.
*geekish swagger*
no subject
no subject
I shan't be downloading IE8; thank you very much for the warning, dearie.
LOL! I can see you now, wrestling with the funky Explorer 8.
no subject
"the funky Explorer 8"
Purely as a statistical anomaly, "funky" wasn't one of the adjectives I used.
You must have misheard.
no subject
It was only last Sunday that I called Hutch "Ellen". My mind is slipping.
no subject
"practicing "decorum""
As in "decoral sex"?
no subject
no subject
Just don't mention teabagging, okay?
no subject
Which reminds me, I'm going to a garden party this evening, dahling, poolside. I'll be thinking of you . . . and your Tetleys.
no subject
Glad to see you've cleaned this up a bit in your edit . . .
no subject
no subject
I use Firefox at home. Or Epiphany. Or Midori. I tried Chrome once; it was kind of fun but not worth switching. There's also a 'port of Firefox called Iceweasel, which I find amusing, although I haven't used it.
no subject
"we have uber-fast internet"
My guess is that it's the computer that determines this, not the internet connection -- Microsoft programs always use about five times the system resources they should on the idiotic assumption that everyone has the very latest and biggest hardware, and I suspect (although it's only "suspect") that the other way I could have solved the problem was to buy an extra gigabyte or three of memory, a faster chip, etc., etc., etc.
Microsoft reminds me of law colleges in so many respects . . .
no subject
Just to let you know that yesterday I took my courage in both hands and installed Firefox. So far, so -- although it has some funny little ways I'm not yet used to -- good.
no subject
no subject
And now you can install AdBlock Plus and discover WHY we all use Firefox! (Tools -> Add-ons -> Get Add-ons -> search box, find AdBlock Plus and click!)
Oodles of thanks for the tip! I'll go do that right now.
What I can't do with Firefox is reply to LJ comments via the "Post Reply" button on LJ's e-mails: I jest get an error message, so that I have to swear a lot and then try again via "View the thread" or whatever. Is there a way round this?
no subject
If that's not the problem, then I'll have to ask Ben (my husband). He probably knows.
no subject
All other links work fine, including those in LJ e-mails. The only thing that doesn't work is the ability to type my reply to a comment in the box in the LJ e-mail and then click the "Post Reply" button below the box.
I should hunt around my LJ options and see if there's something there that hasn't been checked.
no subject
I can assure you that these were not the words! LOL!
no subject
I probably said "bottoms!" and "heavens to Betsy" once or twice as well.
no subject
no subject
I watched a Scottish flick the other night and couldn't understand a thing they were saying, had to turn on the subtitles. And they were speaking English, I think, or something trying to pass for English. ;P
no subject
If Scots can understand the American corruption of English but Americans can't understand the Scottish corruption of English, what does that say about the relative IQs of the two peoples?
Hm?
no subject