Entry tags:
phew!
Much of my energy the past few months has gone into writing an essay on time-travel fiction for a scholarly book Keith Brooke is editing for publication by Palgrave Macmillan next Fall: The Sub-genres of Science Fiction: Strange Divisions and Alien Territories. Since I'm no academic, whenever I do something like this there's definite anxiety as I wait to hear the judgment of its adequacy . . . or, as I usually convince myself during the waiting period, of its many and profound inadequacies. This was especially so in this instance since Keith has otherwise assembled a very distinguished bunch of contributors.
Here, although the running order may well change, is the contents list:
Foreword - Michael Swanwick
Hard Science Fiction - Gary Gibson
Space Opera - Alastair Reynolds
Alternative History - Kristine Kathryn Rusch
Topian Science Fiction - Keith Brooke.
Aliens - Justina Robson
Planetary Romance - Catherine Asaro and Kate Dolan
After the Apocalypse - James Lovegrove
Religion - Adam Roberts
Time Travel - John Grant
Cyberpunk and the Human-Machine Interface - James Patrick Kelly
Special Powers - Paul Di Filippo
Post-Human - Tony Ballantyne
Afterword: Picking Up the Pieces - Keith Brooke
My own chapter proved to be a monster. The first draft was nearly 15,000 words long -- somewhat over the target figure of 5000. After much painful amputation, I got it down to 11,000 words and asked Keith for advice. With the help of his suggestions, I finally submitted at just over 8000 words . . . and then the waiting began.
Well, the waiting's over, and: Phew! My piece apparently passes the mustard. Er, cuts muster. Something like that.
And now commences another -- but this time much more pleasant -- period of waiting: waiting to read the other essays in the book, to which I'm very much looking forward!
no subject
Hm. I'm not sure "McCormack" is as easily rhymable as "Grant". On the other hand . . .
"The sea is not full," remarked Una.
"There is room for at least one more schooner,
Plus luxury yachts,
And some floating nite spachts --
I.e., cruise ships complete with a crooner."
no subject
no subject
"Into verse does not eas'ly decant.
It takes a full story
To capture life's glory.
The limerick form is too scant."
no subject
Excellent! A keeper!
For requiems, once they are started,
Cannot be just lightly departed:
To sneak out the door
Would cause rage and furor
As if at a funeral one'd farted.
no subject
As the site moves on, I offer:
"What's the use?" sighed the woebegone pair
(That's McCormack and Grant - should you care!).
"Oh, the things one must do
To earn one's review!
Fart gags and doggerel. Unfair!"
no subject
Again fine stuff. Perhaps we should ask the Spintinglers to review these instead? A veritable "Leaves of Grass" de nos jours, I can already hear them say. Meanwhile . . .
This ongoing procrastination
makes t'pub seem the best destination.
The sole cause for brio
's the pair is a trio --
for McK's in the same situation.
no subject
A veritable "Leaves of Grass" de nos jours, I can already hear them say.
Funny, I can hear that too...
Right. Nearly 4pm here. Must get back to work!
no subject
We're now down to a duo: they've posted a review of McKinty's story.
Between this and missing out on the Nobel Literature Prize yet again, it's not been the best of weeks.
no subject
no subject
You're right, obviously. And it's cheering to think that his hasn't been reviewed there either.
no subject
no subject
I bet he's glad he's in such good company.
I agree. This could be the making of him.