jus' wondering

[realthog]

Tony Blair has today been defending in front of the Chilcott Inquiry his decision to support the invasion of Iraq on the grounds that, after all, the world's a better place without Saddam Hussein.

That this is so is difficult to dispute.

What none of the entirely unbiased members of the Inquiry seems to have thought worth asking is this: Is the world a better place without all of the other one frigging million Iraqis killed in consequence of Blair's self-righteously defended war?

You've got the blood of the innocent on your hands, Blair. When people ask how it got there, don't insult us by answering a different question.