Entry tags:
glass houses / stones
No names, no pack drill, but here's from a review of a friend's anthology that's just appeared on one of the sf sites:
If you want a change from Science Fiction and its grey cousins and love purple prose on more mundane subjects then [this anthology] will probably suit you. It's not as if any of the material isn't badly written just that for the most part, it isn't our genre or subject matter. There are some instances where the stories could have done with having done with having a bit more plot chucked at them but when they do, it's obvious the writers did their research to bring the material to life.
no subject
no subject
Ah, the art of tepid reviewing.
It's the juxtaposition of an airy judgement concerning fine writing with the language in which that judgement is expressed. Or do I prefer the inability to treat a book as the book it actually is rather than in terms of its relation to an arbitrary genre?
"War and Peace is not a cook book, so there may not be much to interest you here . . ."
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You're being polite. It's dire!
no subject
You and your lawyerspeak.
no subject
no subject
And doesn't the wording of that quote actually mean the opposite from what its author seems to intend?
no subject
no subject
"And doesn't the wording of that quote actually mean the opposite from what its author seems to intend?"
You got it in one.
no subject
Okay: in two.
no subject
no subject
That's classic . . . and sad at the same time.
no subject
To be honest, with a reviewer like this, it's like one of those instruction manuals where everything has been translated into English by someone who doesn't speak the language . . .
no subject
The full review is packed with such stuff.
no subject
no subject
Oh, you found it, did you?
no subject
no subject
I love this person.