Skip to Main Content
ext_59025 (
realthog.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
realthog
2009-07-17 09:19 pm (UTC)
no subject
Further to my last note, there's a pretty accurate review of the movie here:
http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/movies/15harry.html?8mu&emc=mu
. My only difference from the reviewer would be that I thought (Pam disagrees) Rickman wasn't up to his usual speed.
Oh, and the reviewer doesn't mention that some of the visuals were extraordinarily lovely.
(
41 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
Further to my last note, there's a pretty accurate review of the movie here: http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/movies/15harry.html?8mu&emc=mu. My only difference from the reviewer would be that I thought (Pam disagrees) Rickman wasn't up to his usual speed.
Oh, and the reviewer doesn't mention that some of the visuals were extraordinarily lovely.